Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Leyline | xenowan | 4-3 | None |
Rakdos Aggro | kodywithak | 2-3 | None |
Gruul Leyline | peregrinebp | 0-1 | None |
Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Rakdos Aggro , Red Deck Wins , Unknown Archetype
Felonious Rage ranks #104 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 26%).
Red average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Felonious Rage is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Performance Efficiency: 11.54 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Felonious Rage has a win rate of 46.2%, making it 37.8% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 12 | 68.7% | 1 |
Duress | Sorcery | 16 | 63.8% | 2 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 7 | 62.0% | 0 |
Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 17 | 56.3% | 3 |
Might of the Meek | Instant | 23 | 47.4% | 3 |
Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 14 | 46.8% | 1 |
Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 24 | 44.1% | 3 |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 6 | 43.5% | 1 |
Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 31 | 41.1% | 3 |
Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 31 | 40.8% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Felonious Rage than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Rakdos Aggro | 20 | 32.8% | 35.3% |
Gruul Leyline | 6 | 3.1% | 48.1% |
Gruul Aggro | 5 | 0.2% | 34.0% |
Red Deck Wins | 4 | 0.3% | 30.7% |
Unknown Archetype | 1 | 0.3% | 100.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.